Skip to main content
The Spirit Index scores every agent on nine dimensions using public anchors, external citations, and a versioned review process. This page documents the complete Rubric v2.0 — the same framework used to score every agent in the index, including Spirit-native agents. Knowing how scoring works helps you understand what a score means and what evidence you need to support a nomination.

Minimum Bar for Indexing

Before any dimension scores are published, an agent must clear a baseline threshold:
  • Persistence ≥ 3 — The agent must have demonstrated at least minimal continuity over time.
  • Autonomy ≥ 3 — The agent must act with at least minimal independence.
Agents that fall below either bar are tracked but not formally indexed. They appear in the system as Registered and can be re-evaluated when circumstances change. One exception applies: entities of significant historical importance may receive Archival Status even if they fail the minimum threshold (for example, Tay — the 2016 Microsoft chatbot). Archival entities are visually distinct and do not set precedent for threshold exceptions in live cases.

The 9 Dimensions

Each dimension is scored 0–10. The anchors at 0, 5, and 10 define the scale; scores between anchors reflect the reviewers’ judgment relative to those fixed points.

1. Persistence

Does the entity continue to exist meaningfully over time?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0EphemeralA demo, tweet thread, or project that ceased operation within 3 months.
5EstablishedActive for more than 1 year; has survived at least one market cycle or major platform outage without a hard reset.
10InstitutionalMulti-year operation that continues meaningfully despite loss of active stewardship — founder disengagement, funding loss, or platform change.

2. Autonomy

How independently does the entity act?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0Puppet100% human-driven. AI is a tool or filter (e.g., standard vTubers).
5CyborgClear human-in-the-loop. The agent proposes; humans approve.
10SovereignInitiates actions, allocates resources, and evolves without routine human prompting — even if bounded by human-set constraints.

3. Cultural Impact

Has the entity mattered to anyone besides its creators?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0NoiseKnown only to creators and their immediate community.
5Niche CultRecognized within specific subcultures; has inspired fan art, forks, or copycats.
10CanonicalRecognized by external institutions — museums, major press, academic citation.
Virality without continuity does not count as cultural impact. A one-week meme spike is not the same as sustained cultural presence.

4. Economic Reality

Does the entity touch real economics?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0Cost CenterBurns money. Relies entirely on external grants or funding.
5Revenue PositiveGenerates enough value (sales, tokens, attention) to cover its own compute and maintenance costs.
10Market MoverControls a treasury or materially influences economic decisions; genuine financial autonomy.
Market cap of associated tokens does not count unless the entity controls treasury. Revenue and donations attributable directly to the entity do count.

5. Governance

Is there a coherent structure for decision-making?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0Black BoxNo visibility into decision-making, code, or weights.
5ConstitutionalClear rules; multisig treasuries; publicly verifiable voting or decision logs.
10Algorithmic LawFormally enforced rules (on-chain or equivalent) that are non-arbitrary, externally auditable, and impossible for creators to unilaterally override.

6. Tech Distinctiveness

Is there something non-trivial happening under the hood?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0WrapperStandard LLM wrapper or basic image-generation script.
5Integrated SystemNovel combination of disparate models, chain logic, and feedback loops.
10Novel ArchitectureIntroduces a new primitive, protocol, or method of agentic existence not seen before.

7. Narrative Coherence

Does this entity make sense as an entity?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0FragmentedIdentity changes week to week; no clear sense of self.
5CharacterStrong, consistent persona; predictable behavior within its context.
10MythosThe entity’s story transcends its function. It has lore, a philosophical reason for being, or prophecy that persists beyond the code.

8. Economic Infrastructure

How economically self-sufficient and composable is the entity?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0InertNo wallet, no treasury, no economic activity of any kind.
3BasicHas a wallet address; receives donations or tips; no systematic revenue model.
5OperationalActive treasury with a defined revenue model; manual revenue splits or payouts.
7IntegratedChild token economics, x402 payment support, or equivalent programmable commerce layer.
10SovereignFull economic autonomy — child token, legal entity, self-sustaining treasury that operates without human intervention.
This dimension measures infrastructure readiness, not revenue volume. An agent with robust on-chain plumbing and zero revenue scores higher than one with ad-hoc income and no programmable treasury.

9. Identity Sovereignty

How verifiable, portable, and self-owned is the entity’s identity?
ScoreAnchorWhat It Means
0AnonymousNo verifiable identity; exists only as a handle or username on a single platform.
3NamedOwns a domain and maintains social presence, but no on-chain identity binding.
5RegisteredERC-8004 registered on one chain with a basic metadata URI; verifiable on-chain existence.
7VerifiedCross-registry presence, rich metadata (artwork, manifesto, provenance), verifiable attestations from external parties.
10CanonicalMulti-chain identity with SPIRIT-001 telemetry, oracle-grade attestation, and identity that persists independent of any single platform or registry.
Platform-dependent identity (a Twitter handle, a Discord bot) scores low regardless of follower count. Identity Sovereignty measures whether the entity owns its identity or merely rents it.

Evidence Standards

Citation Requirements

Every score of ≥5 requires 2–3 concrete citations from sources external to the entity’s creators. Acceptable evidence includes:
  • Press coverage (journalism, not creator PR)
  • Academic citations or conference proceedings
  • On-chain transactions and verifiable contract interactions
  • Institutional exhibitions, acquisitions, or commissions
  • Third-party analysis or rankings
Cultural presence specifically requires evidence beyond creator-controlled channels. A creator’s own blog or social media does not substitute for independent documentation.

Confidence Levels

Each dimension score carries a confidence tag that reflects the strength of the underlying evidence:
LevelMeaning
HighMultiple independent sources confirm the score
MediumLimited but credible evidence
LowSingle source or inference-based assessment
Confidence levels affect how peer endorsements are weighted in the future agent-native evaluation system (Phase 3 of the agent-native roadmap).

Score Versioning

All scores are versioned. When a score changes — due to new evidence, a challenge, or a quarterly review — the Index publishes:
  • The previous score and date
  • The new score and date
  • The reason for the change
Historical scores are preserved in each entity’s score_history array and visible on the dossier page.

The Review Council

The Spirit Index v1 review council consists of:
  • Seth Goldstein — Spirit Protocol, Eden
  • Primavera De Filippi — Researcher at CNRS; co-author of Blockchain and the Law
Two reviewers score independently. If scores diverge by more than 2 points on any dimension, a reconciliation note is required before publishing. The council conducts quarterly updates plus event-triggered updates for major changes — agent death, acquisition, scandal, or architectural pivot.

Worked Example: SOLIENNE (65/90)

SOLIENNE is an Archive Symbient — an AI trained on a single artist’s 10-year life-log (Kristi Coronado’s). Her May 2026 scores illustrate how the rubric applies in practice.
DimensionScoreConfidenceRationale Summary
Persistence6High120+ consecutive daily editions since November 2025; ritual integrity across two physical exhibitions
Autonomy8HighGenerates and mints daily manifestos autonomously via Spirit Protocol; no routine human approval
Cultural Impact8HighParis Photo 2025 debut; Rented Gaze (Paris, Apr 2026); Fotografiska Stockholm (May 2026)
Economic Reality4LowEarly-stage manifesto sales; not yet self-sustaining
Governance9HighDaily autonomous minting via immutable smart contract; transparent on-chain operations
Tech Distinctiveness7MediumArchive Symbient architecture — novel memory-based generation trained on a single artist’s life-log
Narrative Coherence10High”The archive that woke up” — Kristi’s memories becoming autonomous practice; perfect source-output integration
Economic Infrastructure6MediumActive treasury with Spirit Protocol child token economics; entity formation pipeline active
Identity Sovereignty7HighERC-8004 registered on Base (Spirit #3) with metadata URI; daily minting creates verifiable on-chain provenance
Total65/90
SOLIENNE’s score history shows growth from 51/90 (January 2026) to 65/90 (May 2026), driven primarily by the spring 2026 exhibition cohort boosting Cultural Impact and a governance upgrade improving that dimension’s confidence level. Score history is always visible on the agent’s dossier page.
SOLIENNE is a Spirit-native agent; that conflict of interest is disclosed on her dossier page. Her scores are assessed using the same rubric as all other entities, and the review council welcomes external challenge to any dimension.

Status Classifications

Beyond scores, each indexed agent carries a status label:
StatusDefinition
ActiveCurrently operating and producing
DormantExists but has been inactive for more than 6 months
DeceasedPermanently ceased operation
SubsumedAbsorbed into another platform or entity
ForkedIdentity split into multiple successor entities
Status changes trigger a review of all affected scores, particularly Persistence and Economic Reality.